Main Menu

Core lam guesses

Started by m&m, November 18, 2023, 08:27:29 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

m&m

Here's what I've got on hand .050 glass. Design is 60" 59 Kodiak , wanting 55# @ 28"
Any educated guess on what core stack should work?

Kirkll

There are many different things that could effect your core thickness. The actual shape of the limb, riser length from fade tip to fade tip, taper rate being used, tip wedges used, or not, Length of working limb, location of string notches, and where exactly are you measuring the limb thickness?

Need more info to even venture a guess.... Kirk
Big Foot Bows
Traditional Archery
bigfootbows@gmail.com
http://bigfootbows.com/b/bows/

Mad Max

I would rather fail at something above my means, than to succeed at something  beneath my means  
}}}}===============>>

Kirkll

Big Foot Bows
Traditional Archery
bigfootbows@gmail.com
http://bigfootbows.com/b/bows/

garyschuler

Seeing how you are wanting a guess, i'll guess .250" at the fades. Now build it and tell me how close i am. Then you know about how much give or take to change it on the next one. There's my guess lol !!! Good luck!!
Gary Schuler

kennym

I think I'd do some measuring on a  60" 59 Kodiak if you can get hold of one, then you should be close ...

I looked at Binghams chart for a 60" recurve and it showed .274 total  including glass and cores I believe, don't know what thickness they used.

Sorry, not a recurve guy...
Stay sharp, Kenny.

   https://www.kennysarchery.com/

garyschuler

I've got a 58# 62" Kodiak Special. It's .270" at the fades, so i think .250" is in the ball park. Maybe .255".
Unless you change riser length or Limb width, wide tips hook length. Or , or ,or !!!
Gary Schuler

m&m

Thanks for the guesses, I do have a 59 repro 58#@28 it measures.250 just past fades and .250 in center of hooks . Not positive on glass thickness. Gonna try two core lams .060 no taper and see what happens.

m&m

Well, it came out 40@28 I'll put up a picture when it's finished.

Mad Max

#9
.050 glass x 2
.060 core x 2
So you had a .220 stack and got 40#??

This is very accurate AFTER you have and know the stack and weight.
All of us have to guess on the stack for a new form.
I would rather fail at something above my means, than to succeed at something  beneath my means  
}}}}===============>>

Kirkll

Hey Max.... Reading the notes on that lam stack calculator at the bottom of the page, it states that lengthening a riser length 1" on a TD bow will increase the draw weight 3.5#, and decreasing it will decrease the weight......   What's up with that?

That doesn't seem right to me...  I build my different length risers in 2" increments and have a totally different
experience with the longer bows having a lighter draw weight at the same draw length.   

BUT..... i use that calculator a lot, and it's pretty close if you have good data to input.   Kirk
Big Foot Bows
Traditional Archery
bigfootbows@gmail.com
http://bigfootbows.com/b/bows/

Mad Max

That was a typo and it's out there on there on everyone's Excel word. :biglaugh:

Yeah it works for me too. :thumbsup:
I would rather fail at something above my means, than to succeed at something  beneath my means  
}}}}===============>>

m&m

I was going to use .060 but received .055 and came out with 40#
I'll get this one finished up gain some more experience and try again, wouldn't want to do this for anymore than a hobby, a person could starve before he figures it all out.

Mad Max

Quote from: m&m on December 29, 2023, 08:04:16 PM
I was going to use .060 but received .055 and came out with 40#
I'll get this one finished up gain some more experience and try again, wouldn't want to do this for anymore than a hobby, a person could starve before he figures it all out.

.210 stack =40# then .234 would be for 55# :thumbsup:
I would rather fail at something above my means, than to succeed at something  beneath my means  
}}}}===============>>

Contact Us | Trad Gang.com © | User Agreement

Copyright 2003 thru 2025 ~ Trad Gang.com ©