3Rivers Archery




The Trad Gang Digital Market














Contribute to Trad Gang and Access the Classifieds!

Become a Trad Gang Sponsor!

Traditional Archery for Bowhunters




RIGHT HAND BOWS CLASSIFIEDS

LEFT HAND BOWS CLASSIFIEDS

TRAD GANG CLASSIFIEDS ACCESS


Alum. Arrow to replace a 600 carbon for spine

Started by SS Snuffer, December 12, 2024, 03:57:42 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

SS Snuffer

Chuck
Kodiak Mag 52" 41 lb.
Kota Kill-Um 60" 42 lb.
Kanati 58" 38 lb.
Black Hunter Longbow 60" 40 lb.

No Guts - No Story

3dmuzzy

Put some air under it.

McDave

Depending on length and point weight either an 1816 or 1916 should work.  I shoot either .600 GT Ultralight carbons or .600 Victory Vap's in several bows.  I like to enter a trad tournament every year that requires either aluminum or wood arrows.  1816's cut to 27 3/4" with 90 grain points makes a good substitute for either carbon arrow I mentioned.  The 1816's are still heavier than the carbons, but are the lightest aluminum arrows I can find that work.  However, for a longer arrow or a heavier point, I would use 1916's.
TGMM Family of the Bow

Technology....the knack of arranging the world so that we don't have to experience it.

Kelly

The 600 carbons I've tested are 53# spine. A 1916 is 53# spine on the same spine tester. So is a 2013 which is also lighter in grain weight.
>>>>============>

Enjoy the flight of an arrow amongst Mother Nature's Glory!

Once one opens the mind to the plausible, the unbelievable becomes possible!

>>>>============>

Yours for better bowhunting, Kelly

SS Snuffer

Chuck
Kodiak Mag 52" 41 lb.
Kota Kill-Um 60" 42 lb.
Kanati 58" 38 lb.
Black Hunter Longbow 60" 40 lb.

No Guts - No Story

Tajue17

just my opinion because I shoot 600's and aluminum's and depending on the bow I use 1916, 2016 with heavier point , 2114 for a faster flatter flying arrow...
"Us vs Them"

Contact Us | Trad Gang.com © | User Agreement

Copyright 2003 thru 2025 ~ Trad Gang.com ©